A couple of weeks ago, I started writing this blog post about
the future of the Marcuria series, and it got away from me a little bit because
there is so much about this series that I wanted to communicate to you guys. I
am very excited about its potential, so it’s been hard to bottle that up into a
handful of sentences. Hence, what I’m going to do is I’m going to slow down and
take it step by step. Today I will try to briefly discuss some of my likes and
dislikes about the fantasy genre—so you know where I’m coming from and so you
know what to expect from the series as a whole.
Aside from books written by a select handful of fantasy
authors, who do the genre justice and whom I trust, I just can’t read novels found
within this generic classification. I am quite disgusted by fantasy books, close
to outright despising them because. . .because the genre attracts too many amateurs
who don’t know how to write and who are stuck in the 1970’s mindset of what
fantasy is. There. I said it. When done right, a good tale set within imaginative
settings can strike so many chords within a person; it can be an experience of
tremendous beauty and enlightenment. When done poorly, there is nothing worse
to read on the planet Earth. At that point, I’d rather slog through a literary
novel. Yep. That’s how bad it can get.
Because a fantasy story requires so many moving parts—both
visible and behind-the-scenes—and because it requires multiple characters with
varied points of view, it is a difficult genre to get right and do properly,
especially for a new writer. (I didn’t realize this when I began, diving right
in to the deep-end of the pool, which in hindsight was a mistake; doing that
can quickly destroy your confidence as you flounder at first in trying to
master so many varying elements that authors of other genres just don’t have to
bother with.) When fantasy is not done with precision and masterful
craftsmanship, the story’s weaknesses become glaring faults that can cause the
believability and cohesion of your story to crumble in the eyes of many
readers.
Now that we’ve gotten that out of the way, allow me to quickly
go through some (just some) of the specific elements I like and dislike about
the genre. Since I don’t want to appear negative, I’ll start with what I like.
Some
likes:
Pure
escapism. These novels allow me to escape to a place bearing no
resemblance (on the surface at least) to the world in which I live and to the
life I experience. I often need to disappear out of my life for a while each
day in order to help me regroup and to help me recover some measure of sanity.
Staggering
displays of sheer creativity. Intricacies: plot threads
and other details that weave in and out of various storylines; complex and
detailed histories. I enjoy descriptions of exotic locations; I love reading
about original creatures and races (not fantasy cliches) that feel like an
organic part of the world and land, like they actually belong there and aren’t
out of place. In Tad Williams’ Shadowmarch series, there is a race living on
and around the city’s lagoon whose features are human but also fishlike. Not
once did it occur to me that that was unusual or ill-fitting. It made perfect
sense that they would look like that and they should live there, in an
environment in which they could thrive.
Down
and out characters: people who are on the outskirts or lower rungs of society
(thieves, assassins, beggars, whores, the mentally disturbed, urchins, the poor).
These are the most interesting characters to write / read about. These are segments
of a society where a tremendous amount of mystery and secretiveness can be
found. This is an area that is gold for uncovering dramatic tension in your
stories.
Prevailing
sense of mystery and secrecy. Nothing piques my interest
more than an adventure where there’s a chance of uncovering the unknown or the
chance to reveal long forgotten secrets in worlds where there are those who
feel that all the knowledge that can be learned, has been learned. How cool is
it when a character has to travel through an old, forgotten tomb or when
ancient ruins are discovered and searched and explored, revealing dark secrets
or an artifact lost to history. A couple of additional elements that excite me:
adventures into dark caves; walks down hoary, overgrown paths in the oldest
sections of unmapped forests where anything the imagination dreams up can be
discovered.
-------------------------------------------------
Now, here we get to the part that’s going to get me in
the most trouble with fantasy authors who desperately want to hold onto the old,
stereotypical ways of looking at this genre. Well, without further ado, let’s
get to the “boom,” shall we?
Some
dislikes / gripes:
Dragons. Do
I really need to explain myself here? People: stop with the dragons, already!
We’ve had enough! Do something new! Dragons have been written about for nearly
a hundred years! There are thousands upon thousands of novels written about these
beasts; what makes you think that your latest novel featuring a dragon is anything
exciting, anything intriguing or different, or that it’s going to be something people
even want to read? It’s hard enough to make it in this business. You’re better
off crafting cohesive originality.
Dipping
into the Tolkien well for ideas. What I hate about fantasy,
why I sometimes hate reading it is that authors too often dip into the “Tolkien
well” for inspiration. The dude has been dead forever; the stuff he has created
is tired and boring at this point. Writing about traditional fantasy races
(elves, dwarves, fairies) = total grossville. These crutches are used way too
often by inexperienced writers or just plain lazy writers who think that the
inclusion of these beings will earn them an audience and that it will translate
into a quick buck. At this point, these stereotypical creatures are tedious garbage.
Leave them out. Start fresh and you’ll be surprised at what you’ll be able to
create. You’ll feel much better about yourself as you do honest work that
doesn’t rely on the writings of long-dead novelists.
Long,
drawn out war scenes. These must be for people who love war. I
don’t. These scenes are tedious and hard to follow; I often don’t care enough
about what’s going on, so I quickly lose interest. Seems like there’s a war
scene in every fantasy novel. Is it required? Is it on some checklist I don’t
know about? Let’s do something new, shall we. Please.
The
use of kings and queens or princes and princesses as main characters. Total
grossville! Nothing is more played out than that. If I read just one more novel
about a prince or princess, a king or queen, or worst of all, an elf princess,
I’m going to have an electronic book burning. Novelers: these characters usually
aren’t around the action. The action’s happening down in the cities, down in
the slums. Write about the denizens residing there and your novels will be ten times
more exciting and fleshed-out. You’ll be writing like ol’ Charlie Dickens in no
time.
Damsels
in distress. People still write about these sexist
abominations that need to be put out of their misery. (Uh. . . No, I didn’t
just say what you think I said.)
Stories
of good forces vs evil forces. Is anybody entirely good
or entirely evil? Why separate them into clustered groups of “good guys” and “bad
guys”? You’re sure to have a mix of light and dark in every group. . . . Just
sayin’. If you want cut-and-dried characters, clearly on one side or the other,
then read a YA novel and don’t read mine. Apparent distinctions of “bad” or “good”
make for an uninspired and uninteresting story. The most fascinating books are
more complex than this and explore the issue with subtlety and grace. I’m not
saying that the theme of good vs evil should be abolished, since each of us are
involved in the “invisible war” and can relate: the theme should be buried
underneath layers so it’s not blatantly obvious. Give the “bad guy” some white
and make him a little gray. Take the hero and give him some dark to balance
things out. These touches will make your characters more relatable, thereby
strongly connecting readers to your work. Your art will become memorable.
Shallow
characters and stories that hold no weight. There’s no excuse
for this if you write in this genre. Anything you want to include in your world
you can include. No excuse not to develop your world and those who populate
your stories so that they breathe. No excuse not to have plenty of tension and
drama in your stories.
Epic
series that go for ten volumes or longer. These put me into a deep
sleep as the tension gradually oozes out of the series. Seems like the trend is
that the middle of the series will wander for a few books before picking back
up at the very end for the grand finale. A cash grab. That’s what it is. And
I’m not sure that it’s the author herself necessarily making the decision to do
this. If novelists insist on writing a prolonged series, they should separate
the books into separate “mini-series’” within the overall series so at least a
part of the story can be resolved before I jump off the wagon. Or, so I can
jump back on whenever I want instead of being stuck having to slog through each
novel in order to attain resolution.
Thousand-page
novels. (See above: similar complaint here). Halfway through,
these books often meander and become boring before picking up again. In my old
age of thirty-five and with my tired brain, I have a tough time getting through
any book, so I really can’t stomach another one of these lengthy beasts. The
temptation for writers is to include everything—every
scrap of detail, every scene. Please don’t. The delete key on your keyboard has
a purpose. Please use it and save us all the tedium of plodding through these
piles of word monstrosities.
Fantasy
cliches on book covers. No offense to indie authors, but if I
see another one of your covers featuring a dragon, an elf, a fairy, a princess,
a fairy elf princess, a big sword, a little sword, a medium sword, a big fat
little medium sword, or a freakin’ castle, I’m going to scream your friggin’ head
off. We’re trying to do 2014 fantasy here, not the 1970’s psychedelic version
of merry fairies dancing in brightly lit forests with floppy-hat wearing gnomes.
--------------------------------
What are your fantasy likes or dislikes? Do you agree
with me or disagree? Feel free to add your comments below.
Stay tuned for part 2 where I will discuss my plans for
the Marcuria series.
I find it interesting that you cite pure escapism as one of the reasons you enjoy the fantasy genre. I find that both sci-fi and fantasy offer an opportunity for rich allegorical commentary on contemporary societal issues. Although the worlds are often quite different from our own, they tackle the same problems in ways that offer potential solutions for our world. They engage my brain in a way that, say, a beach novel wouldn't.
ReplyDeleteVery true, Trudy. You're right. The First Law trilogy by Joe Abercrombie did a great job of this. I don't like it when the allegory is in your face and brings you back to thinking about the problems of the real world. However, this characteristic will probably be an element in my writing for years to come, whether I know it or not. Sounds weird for me to say that, but I didn't realize until about two-thirds of the way through that this book was a giant allegory for my life at the time I was writing it and a reflection of all that I was experiencing. I write from my sub-conscious.
ReplyDeleteUsing allegories is not going to ever be a conscious effort for me, nor is it an aspect that I necessarily enjoy from other writers. Just not my thing. For reasons of my own health, I need that escapism, not reminders of what I should be fearing or worrying about.